Previous PageTable Of ContentsNext Page

Acclimatization and utilization of phyllodineous acacias from Australia in Senegal**

O. Hamel

Directeur du Department des Recherches Forestières et Hydrobiologiques de l'Institute Sénégalais de Recherches Agricoles. Center National de Recherches Forestièeres BE 2312, Dakar, Senegal.


Introduction

1. Nursery production

2. On-site behaviour of species

2.1. Bambey site

2.2. Bandia site

2.3. Keur-Mactar site

2.4. Linguere site

2.5. Mbiddi site

3. Suitability of species

3.1. Browse

3.2. Windbreaks

3.3. Soil protection and regeneration

3.4. Browse and other production

4. General conclusions

Annex Ia

Annex Ib

Annex Ic.

Annex II

Annex III

Annex IV

Annex V


Introduction

The Senegalese Forestry Research Institute has planted a collection of acacias previously unknown to Africa on a number of stations characteristic of the Sudanian and Sahel area of Senegal. A crop of Australian seeds was used, procured in 1973 by the Centre Technique Forestier Tropical in cooperation with the Australian Forestry Timber Board. Most of the seed introduced came from the Northern and West Australian territories, the climatic conditions with regard to the Australian seeds and the Senegalese sites chosen for introduction are briefly described in Annex I to this paper.

The species introduced were as follows:

a) from Australia: A. bivenosa, A. coriacea, A. dunnii, A. farnesiana, A. holosericea, A. inaequilatera, A. aff. Linarioides, A. monticola, A. mountfordae, A. plectocarna, A. pyrifolia, A. sclerosperma, A. spathulata, A. tenuisissima, A. tetragonophylla, A. tumida;

b) from the Maghreb: A. cyanophylla, A. Cyclops, A. salicina.

Nursery production

Raising these Acacia spp. in the nursery poses on particular problems. Direct pot sowing (2 seeds per pot) gives very good results, with an excellent germination rate.

Depending on the site it may be necessary to use shading during the period before the phyllodes appear, i.e. for about a fortnight, but usually the resistance of these species means that this precaution is not necessary. The nursery stage lasts about 3 months. The only precautions necessary are on the health side, against cutworm and nematodes. The latter precaution is important since, like all acacias, these species are sensitive to nematodes, and the risk of infestation on virgin land resulting from the introduction of these species is considerable. Furthermore, nematodes prevent the formulation of rhizobia nodules and thus inhibit their nitrogen-fixative capacity. Nematicide treatment also accelerates the development of the plants in the nursery.

Ongoing research at the ORSTOM Soil Microbiology Laboratory in Dakar in collaboration with the Centre National de Recherches Forestières/ISRA is focusing on the selection of species with good nitrogen-fixative properties, on the selection of successful rhizobia strains and on inoculation in the nursery. Inoculation will enable the nursery stage to be shortened while still providing high quality plants. The behaviour of rhizobia when planted during the dry season is also under study.

Since 1979, direct drilling trials in the natural environment have given highly encouraging results, raising hopes that planting the species will prove to be inexpensive.

On-site behaviour of species

2.1. Bambey site

Soil: the soil is known locally as "deck dior", consisting of deck soils (vertisols with a temporarily moist soil climate, lithomorphic soils with massive intergrade surface structure consisting of ferruginous soils) but with a much lower clay content in the upper horizons. Plant spacing: 3m × 3m; the plants were holed manually in large seed holes (60 cm × 60 cm × 60 cm).

The plants introduced in 1974 and 1976 (see Annexes 1 and 2 for detailed results) have enabled an initial idea of the behaviour of these species to be gained:

a) A. cynophylla plants died;

b) A. farnesiana, spathulata, tenuisissima and tetragonophylla are in the process of dying;

c) A. coriacea, dunnii, inaequlatera, monticola, mountfordea, plectocarpa and pyrifolia are surviving but their performance is mediocre;

d) A. bivenosa, holosericea, linariodes, sclerosperma and tumida are behaving satisfactorily.

Since 1976 a comparative trial on behaviour and production between local and Australian acacias has been launched, giving us a clearer idea of their suitability (see the results recorded in Table 1)

Table 1. Comparative trial on behaviour and production of local and Australian acacias: results of measurements at Bambey site, 1976.

 

12/1976

7/1977

12/1977

5/1978

12/1978

6/1979

12/1979

 

H

%

H

H

s

H

s

H

s

H

s

H

s

%

A. seyal

108

 94

154

168

13

181

 9.8

239

22.3

283

29.0

294

30.8

 93

A. senegal

  68

 98

124

160

10

188

11.5

240

26.3

272

29.6

279

31.8

 98

A. raddiana

  89

100

129

161

 9

189

13.0

228

24.0

278

32.4

283

33.7

100

A. holosericea

  60

 97

138

200

13

200

13.9

305

33.0

332

40.0

336

44.0

 96

A.linarioïles

  88

 88

199

229

17

186

21.4

251

61.3

256

65.3

264

67.1

 81

H = height (in cm) s = section (in cm 2)

Variance analysis has demonstrated that since December 1977 the production of Acacia linarioïdes and holosericea has been significantly higher (5% theshold) than local acacias.

In this trial the spacing used was 3m × 3m and it appears that for all species competition become acute in December 1979. The stands were therefore thinned out to 3m × 6m in February 1980, and the data gathered at that time are recorded in Table 2.

Table 2. Comparative trial on behaviour and production of local and Australian acacias: data collected during thinning of stands from 3m × 3m to 3m × 6m at Bambey site, 1976.

Species

Weight (kg) of dry leaves per tree

Weight (kg) of dry leaves per hectare

Weight (kg) of wood per tree

Production (t) of wood per hectare

Production (t) of wood per ha/year

Production in steres per hectare

Production in stere per ha/year

A. seyal

  208

 229

  4.39

  4.8

1.6

18.3

  6

A. senegal

    60

   66

  9.92

10.9

3.6

36.5

12

A. raddiana

  130

  143

  5.89

  6.5

2.1

24.1

  8

A. holosericea

2660

2926

12.03

13.2

4.4

36.5

12

A. linarioïdes

1993

2192

10.65

11.7

3.9

54.7

18

It should be noted that measurements were carried out in the middle of the dry season, a time at which local acacias have lost a large proportion of their leaves, whereas Australian varieties mostly keep theirs.

It emerges clearly that wood production is higher in Australian varieties and that leaf production at this time of the year could contribute significantly to livestock feeds.

2.2. Bandia site

Soil: vertisols and brown eutrophic soils on alluvial clays and zoogenic limestones. The plant spacing used was 4.5 m × 4.5 m, after subsoiling with cross lands to a depth of 50 cm.

The plants introduced in 1977 (see Annex 4 for detailed results) gave results very similar to those at Bambey. Thus:

a) A. cyanophylla, Cyclops and tenuisissima died;

b) A. dunnii, monticola, pyrifolia and tumida may or may not survive;

c) the performance of A. plectocarpa and salicina has to be verified;

d) lastly, A. bivenosa, coriacea, holosericea, linarioïles and sclerosperma gave interesting results (A. bivenosa, coriacea and sclerosperma are forming hybrids).

A. farnesiana, mountfordae and inaequilatera were only introduced at Bandia in 1979; their behaviour is therefore not yet significant.

Comparison of the best Australian varieties with local plants gives the results found in Table 3, but it should be empahsized that here the aim of the trial was to study the behaviour of each species individually and that, as a result, there were no replicates for comparison. Thus, Acacia nilotica and Prosopis juliflora are high as Acacia linarioides, but A. holosericea is the most productive of all.

Table 3. Results of comparison of best Australian with local species.

Species

12/1977

6/1978

12/1978

6/1979

11/1979

 

H

%

H

H

s

%

H

s

H

s

%

A. bivenosa 1538

57

  95

  93

145

10.1

  93

179

14.9

216

28.1

  93

A. coriacea 1460

58

100

105

171

  9.8

100

219

20.8

264

31.9

100

A. holosericea 1459

43

100

144

278

24.4

100

284

19.2

382

63.7

100

A. aff. linarioïdes 1466

90

  96

120

255

19.4

  96

265

13.9

355

45.7

  96

A. sclerosperma 1525

59

  97

  99

154

  9.1

  97

210

16.8

251

27.2

  97

A. nilotica var. adansonii

65

  99

104

195

12.2

  97

230

14.2

305

41.5

  97

A. raddiana

55

100

  53

121

  3.2

100

174

  6.1

258

18.7

  97

A. albida

30

  99

  35

  70

–

  98

108

–

121

–

  92

Prosopis juliflora

87

  99

125

243

11.8

  99

307

23.7

379

40.1

  99

Prosopis cineraria

40

  99

  45

  92

–

  96

124

–

200

–

  92

Direct drilling trials gave the results shown in Table 4. These results may be considered highly encouraging.

Table 4. Results of direct drilling trials.

Species

Treated seeds

Untreated seeds

Final site occupied by a plant

Laboratory Germination

Acacia linarioïdes

28%

21%

80%

92%

Acacia bivenosa

20%

  9%

58%

94%

Acacia holosericea

  8%

10%

52%

97%

Acacia tumida

47%

32%

96%

60%

Acacia senegal

  1%

  0%

  5%

50%

Acacia nilotica

38%

25%

89%

40%

Acacia raddiana

11%

  3%

63%

11%

Acacia seyal

14%

12%

55%

89%

Acacia albida

47%

33%

87%

72%

Prosopis juliflora

13%

5%

44%

88%

2.3. Keur-Mactar site

Soil: this site, located on the edge of a salt pan, has a large variety of soils with more or less pronounced salinity and hydromorphic features. They are characterised by a gradual transition from bare soil with Salontchaks to a plant cover consisting of Combretum, via a grass cover and an Acacia seyal stand. The original mangrove swamp and its surrounding vegetation probably vanished during the last century. Spacing: the spacing used was 3 m × 3 m; the soil was tilled manually and large seed holes were dug (60 cm × 60 cm × 60 cm).

The 1977 trial (for detailed results see Annex 5) was intended to enable a number of Australian acacia species to be selected for colonizing soils of this kind. To this end six types of soil cover were defined:

a) pure salt pan (Ps);

b) salt pan with grass cover (Sg);

c) soil with Acacia seyal (Sa);

d) soil with Combretum (Sc);

e) soil with Parinari (Sp);

f) bottom-land (BI);.

The results recorded were as follows:

a) A. holosericea and linarioïdes behaved quite remarkably throughout the entire range, especially A. holosericea, the performance of which on salt pan is astonishing, to say the least, and may be even suspect; this variety was also the only one to tolerate bottom-land (see Figure 1).

b) A. bivenosa and sclerosperma gave interesting results on soils with A. seyal, while A. plectocarpa did well on Combretum soils.

c) A. tumida, pyrifolia and monticola did not appear to adapt.

The 1978 trial dealt with the forestry methods applicable to these species, from the point of view of both browse and forage production on ferruginous hydromorphic soils with a pre-existing plant cover consisting of Combretum. The first trial tested spacing of 3 m × 3 m, 3 m × 6 m and 6 m × 6 m, using a Latin square layout with Acacia linarioïdes as a control batch.

Spacing

12/1978

6/1979

12/1979

 

H

%

H

%

H

s

%

3 m ×3 m

82

100

177

99

251

45

99

3 m × 6 m

81

100

169

99

268

67

93

6 m × 6 m

84

100

165

99

268

77

95

Figure 1. Behaviour of A.. holosericea and A. linarioides.

The differences on the section recorded in December 1979 are highly significant. It may be noted that these individuals are already as well developed as the Acacia linarioïdes plants of the 1976 trial at Bambey. We may thus assume that foliage production is also about identical after 18 months.

A second trial launched in 1978 focused on the different possible methods for harvesting the wood and the foliage biomass (felling, cutting back, trimming, stripping, etc). Different forms of utilization were applied for the first time in February 1980 and are to be staggered until July 1980. The first results for trees 18 months old subjected to utilization in February and to a spacing of 3 m × 3 m were as follows:

 

Weight of leaves per tree

Weight of leaves per ha (3m × 3m)

Weight of wood per tree

Weight of wood per ha (3m × 3m)

A.linarioïdes

1845g

2029g

5.25 kg

5.77t

Thus it was concluded that the weight of leaves after 18 months was approximately identical to that of the Bambey plantation in 1976 after 36 months.

A third trial launched in 1979 was intended to test direct drilling techniques in the field.

Rates of germination resulting in viable plants.

Soil: edge of salt pans.

Species

Treated seed

Untreated seed

A. holosericea

51%

28%

A. bivenosa

34%

14%

A.linarioides

45%

42%

Prosopis juliflora

27%

  7%

A. seyal

 8%

  1%

Species

Treated seed

Untreated seed

A. holosericea

  2%

  1%

A. albida

27%

14%

It was found that the resistance of young plants is closely linked to the soil type. Other kinds of trial will be launched this year.

2.4. Linguere site

Soil: brown-red subarid intergrade soils and ferruginous tropical soils. Plants were introduced in 1974, but unfortunately the low quantity of seed which we had available at the time only enabled us to plant about 10 individuals for each species. In any case the poor planting, maintenance and follow-up conditions have led us to discount these introductions as insignificant.

2.5. Mbiddi site

Soil: brown-red subarid intergrade soils and poorly developed ferruginous tropical soils. The species introduced were A. holosericea, A. linarioïdes, A. bivenosa, A. pyrifolia and A. tumida. All species developed spectacularly during the first year, but unfortunately there were considerable losses during the second year for A. holosericea and tumida. A. linoarioïdes, bivenosa and pyrifolia are surviving at present without showing any noticeable progress. More detailed research will be carried out in this area during this year.

Following these different adaptability tests, which will moreover be continued, the following selection may be put forward:

a) highly interesting species: A. holosericea and A. linarioïdes;

b) interesting species: A. holosericea, A. sclerosperma and coriacea;

c) species which show promise but will have to be confirmed: A. plectocarpa and A. salicina;

d) species for which we do not have enough experience: A. inaequilatera and A. mountfordae;

e) species not selected for the moment: A. dunnii, A. monticola, A. pyrifolia and A. tumida;

f) species which do not adapt: A. farnesiana, A. spathulata, A. tenuisissima, A. tetragonophylla, A. cyanophylla and A. Cyclops.

3. Suitability of species

3.1. Browse

There is not doubt that the primary suitability of acacias is for browse. The persistence of the leaves throughout the year and the abundant foliage contrast strongly with our traditional acacias.

Feed value analyses have been carried out by the ISRA Laboratoire National de l'Elevage et de Recherches Véterinaires (see results detailed in Table 5).

Table 5. Feed value analyses (in% per kg of dm) of leaves collected on 12 December 1979 at Bandia.

Species

Dry matter

Mineral Contents

Nitrogen extract

Fat matter

Cellulose

Nitrogen free extract

Insoluble hydrochloric acid

P

Ca

A. holosericea

- dry leaves

644

  60

  78

  40

389

433

 6

0.15

15.9

- green leaves

477

  63

141

  87

386

323

 4

0.85

16.1

A.linarioïdes

471

  72

146

  50

326

406

 4

1.55

17.5

A. bivenosa

322

218

162

  30

209

381

12

1.03

61.8

A. sclerosperma

-

199

140

  41

314

306

13

1.36

50.5

A. coriacea

352

190

126

  40

276

368

  3

1.01

48.0

A. plectocarpa

419

  89

147

  75

304

385

31

1.51

32.2

A. salicina

288

147

181

  60

238

374

  4

1.45

37.0

A. tumida

423

  72

157

  67

302

402

20

1.50

19.2

A. pyrifolia

391

  43

157

  53

368

389

  2

1.01

16.8

A. monticola

502

  64

132

  88

275

441

14

0.95

10.5

A. dunnii

412

  92

139

123

346

300

  7

0.77

21.6

A. tenuisissima

490

  48

120

  90

342

400

  3

0.87

  8.8

A. cyanophylla

346

  87

151

  71

328

263

  3

1.33

26.4

Prosopis juliflora

352

110

211

  67

303

309

10

1.86

21.0

Prosopis cineraria

419

  60

135

  45

389

371

  5

1.69

11.8

Compare: Acacia albida

410

  86

171

  30

215

498

41

1.37

14.1

Obviously there are variable differences between the species in terms of contents of primary elements, but all varieties contain valuable levels of nitrogen, higher than 12% and reaching 18%. Three species have a clearly higher level of minerals, especially calcium, than the others: first Acacia bivenosa, then Acacia sclerosperma and Acacia coriacea.

In addition pod harvests were carried out during February 1980 and are currently being analysed.

Finally, the palatability of all these acacia species was tested during December 1979, under the following conditions: a makeshift enclosure round four trees of the same species in which two head of cattle or three sheep were pastured for one or two days at the most. Thus the spontaneous palatability was tested and the results were as follows:

 

Cattle

Sheep

A.linarioïdes

P

P

A. bivenosa

NP

NP

A. sclerosperma

NP

NP

A. coriacea

NP

NP

A. plectocarpa

P

P

A. salicina

PP

PP

A. pyrifolia

P

P

A. monticola

P

P

A. tumida

PP

PP

Prosopis juliflora

PP

PP

Prosopis cineraria

PP

PP

The results presented here are the first ones carried out at a time when the animals still have grassland available in satisfactory amounts and are in a generally good state, but probably they would behave differently if all they could obtain was dried grass which was scanty and poor in feed value. Also, two further tests will be carried out in March and June and it should be noted that, as regards Acacia holosericea the palatability test was positive when the leaves were offered to the animals dry.

Pending the results of the various palatability tests as well as of production experiments using harvesting by trimming, pitching and felling, and pending the launching of trials to determine overall feed biomass (grass cover plus browse) as a function of spacing — and hence the forestry technique to be used — it may be pointed out that some species, especially Acacia linarioïdes offer valuable dry-season browse possibilities which could be utilized either by introducing browse stands on farmland or by organizing forest for pastoral use. In 1980 a pilot scheme will be launched on the Sangalkam experimental farm of the Laboratoire National de l'Elevage et des Recherches Veterinaires (ISRA).

3.2. Windbreaks

Some Australian acacias have a natural habit and a crown which renders them particularly satisfactory as low-stratum components in a windbreak. Particularly advocated is the combination of Eucalyptus camaldulensis with Acacia holosericea. These two species are often combined in their original habitats in Australia:

a) Eucalyptus camaldulensis would provide the upper stratum of the wind-break; it is a tree over 12 m in height in the Sudano-Sahelian zone, but can reach 20 m or more in more favourable conditions. This tree has a first rate ability to put out new shoot and would thus permit regular utilization, while also providing farmers with firewood or timber in large amounts. When two new shoots are selected the wind-break may be built up very rapidly and is entirely satisfactory.

In order to avoid excessive competition with agricultural crops it is recommended that subsoiling along the windbreak be carried out before the dry season so as to cut outrunning roots.

b) Acacia holosericea (probably A. plectocarpa and A. salicina also) would provide the lower level in the windbreak, thanks to its low height (5 to 6 m in the Sahelo-Sudanian zone), but more especially to its plentiful and dense crown, which often very rapidly reaches 4 to 5 m in diameter at both the base and the summit.

The most satisfactory arrangement of these two species would be the following combination:

+ 0+0+0 +

3.3. Soil protection and regeneration

As regards soil protection and particularly the prevention of runoff erosion, all the species are able to play a valuable part, although probably Acacia bivenosa is the most suitable. This bush covers the soil particularly well and its behaviour on difficult land is good. But we can also draw attention to Acacia coriacea, sclerosperma and linarioïdes.

For stabilizing shifting sand, or more accurately for protecting niayes (bottom-land suitable for marshland cultivation) against sand encroachment, a number of tests have been carried out under a UNDP project at Kebemer, using A. holosericea, tumida, linarioïdes, cyanophylla and Cyclops. The behaviour of A. holosericea and linarioïdes is on the whole satisfactory.

3.4. Browse and other production

After 5 years of experiments with these species, it appears that Australian acacias suited to our climate have a browse production which is equal to or higher than local species (see the results at Bambey and Bandia), but our knowledge as to wood quality is largely insufficient and studies on charcoal production and quality have only just begun, using recent utilizations.

Given the growth pattern of the trees it would appear that A. holosericea, plectocarpa and salicina are probably suitable for making good charcoal, since they are trees which have a main trunk, whereas A. linarioïdes, bivenosa, sclerosperma and coriacea are bushes with a large number of fairly thin branches, making them easier to use for firewood than for turning into charcoal.

As regards subsidiary products, studies have not yet begun but they will focus on rubber and honey production, and on any other product which is likely to be valuable to the local population.

4. General conclusions

The different varieties of Australian acacia provide a variety of phyllodes, habit, behaviour and growth which is truly astonishing. We can exploit this rich variety by adapting their features to our own objectives. Thus, if we have to select only one species for each use, we would identify the following in the light of our present knowledge:

a) Acacia linarioïdes for its feed value;

b) Acacia holosericea for windbreaks;

c) Acacia bivenosa for runoff erosion prevention;

d)Acacia holosericea again for firewood and charcoal.

Given our fairly recent experience of the species we cannot yet with any certainty say that their drought resistance is the same as that of local acacias, but if this is the case these acacias will only complete the range of utilization found in our own traditional varieties without in any way replacing them.

In any case our range of intervention in the Sudanian and Sahelian zones has been enriched by several species which can be used with discernment.

Annex Ia

Sites of Australian seeds

Species

Long.

Lat.

Altit.

Distance from sea

Nearest met station

Site where introduced in Senegal

A. bivenosa

1457/CTFT

121 ° 07'

19° 33'

30 m

1 km

Anna Plains and Condon

Bambey – Bandia – Keur – Mactar

1526/CTFT

114° 56'

22° 53'

10 m

75 km

Winning Pool

Bambey

1538/CTFT

113° 57'

21° 57'

10 m

200 km

Onslow

Bambey – Bandia – Linguère – Keur – Mactar – M'Biddi

A. coriacea

1536/CTFT

114° 05'

21° 50'

5 m

200 km

Onslow

Bambey – Bandia – Linguère – Keur– Mactar

A. dunnii

1395/CTFT

126° 37'

14° 37'

90 m

25 km

Port George IV - Wyndham

Bambey – Bandia

A. farnesiana

1534/CTFT

114° 19'

22° 50'

50 m

25 km

Winning Pool and Onslow

Bambey – Bandia – Linguère

A. holosericea

1125/CTFT

131° 07'

13° 21'

120 m

125 km

Katerine and Darwin

Bandia

1459/CTFT

121° 05'

19° 37'

50 m

2 km

Anna Plains and Condon

Bambey – Bandia – Linguère– Keur – Mactar – M'Biddi– Kébémer

A. inaequilatera

1509/CTFT

118° 51'

21° 18'

480 m

183 km

Nullagine

Bambey – Bandia – Linguère – Keur– Mactar

A. off. linarioïdes

1466/CTFT

118° 36'

20° 22'

30 m

10 km

Port Hedland

Bambey – Bandia – Linguère – Keur – Mactar – M'Biddi – Kébémer

A. monticola

1460/CTFT

120° 40'

19° 49'

30 m

5 km

Anna Plains and Condon

Bambey – Bandia – Linguère – Keur – Mactar

A. mountfordae

1217/CTFT

133° 04'

12° 05'

40 m

50 km

Oenpelli and Darwin

Bambey – Bandia

A. Plectocarpa

1261/CTFT

134° 17'

12° 53'

160 m

90 km

Oenpelli and Darwin

Bambey – Bandia

A. pyrifolia

1461/CTFT

119° 26'

20° 03'

100 m

19 km

Condon and Port Hedland

Bambey – Bandia

1477/CTFT

117° 16'

21° 30'

230 m

65 km

Roebourne and Marble Bar

Bambey – Bandia

1524/CTFT

117° 50'

22° 14'

560 m

165 km

Nullagine and Roy Hill

Bambey

1532/CTFT

114° 19'

22° 19'

50 m

25 km

Winnima Pool et Onslow

Bambey – Bandia – Keur – Mactar – M'Biddi

A. sclerosperia

1525/CTFT

117° 09'

22° 59'

400 m

230 km

Nullagine

Bambey – Bandia – Linguère – Keur – Mactar

A. spathulata

1539/CTFT

114° 02'

22° 36'

50 m

15 km

Winning Pool and Onslow

Bambey –Linguère

A. tenuisissima

1485/CTFT

117° 45'

21° 41'

480 m

113 km

Roebourne and Marble Bar

Bambey

1519/CTFT

117° 57'

22° 14'

560 m

164 km

Bullagine and Roy Hill

Bambey– Bandia – Keur – Mactar

A. tetragonophylla

1548/CTFT

113° 26'

24° 15'

5 m

3 km

Carnavon

Bambey – Linguère

A. tumida

1422/CTFT

122° 56'

16° 25'

5 km

600 km

Port George IV

Bambey – Bandia – Linguère– Keur – Mactar – M'Biddi – Kébémer

1462/CTFT

119° 23'

20° 03'

110 m

15 km

Condon and Port Hedland

Bambey – Bandia

1484/CTFT

117° 45'

21° 41'

480 m

113 km

Roebourne and Marble Bar

Bandia

A. cyanophylla

       

Morocco

Bambey – Bandia – Linguère

A. cyclops

       

Morocco

Bandia – Keur – Mactar

A. salicina

       

Tunisia

Bandia – Keur – Mactar

Annex Ib

Climatological data for Australian sites: Meteorological office, Melbourne ( Pls. make the columns of Annex Ib wide) 

Sites

 

01

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

Year

Nullagine 120° 05' – 21° 53' – 385 m (Western Australia)

     

Av. max T. 

°C

  39.0

38.4

36.7

32.9

28.0

24.1

24.0

26.6

31.3

35.0

28.3

39.4

32.8

Av. min T. 

°C

  24.0

23.5

21.7

16.7

11.9

8.3

7.0

8.8

12.3

17.0

21.3

23.3

16.3

Av. T. 

°C

  31.5

30.9

29.2

24.8

19.9

16.2

15.5

17.7

21.8

26.0

29.8

31.4

24.5

Av. rel. humid at 9 hour 

%

  40

40

41

40

46

49

49

43

35

31

30

35

39

Av. daily rel. humid 

%

  25

25

26

25

30

33

33

28

22

19

19

22

26

Rainfall 

mm

  82.8

59.4

51.1

17.3

17.5

20.1

6.1

5.1

1.5

6.6

15.5

46.7

329.7

Marble Bar 119° 54' – 21° 11' – 181 m (Western Australia)

Av. max T. 

°C

  41.2

40.9

30.3

36.1

31.1

27.2

27.0

29.9

34.3

37.8

41.0

41.9

35.7

Av. min T. 

°C

  26.0

25.7

24.9

20.9

16.2

12.6

11.3

13.2

16.5

20.4

24.0

25.7

19.7

Av. T. 

°C

  33.6

33.3

32.1

28.5

23.6

19.9

19.2

21.6

25.4

29.1

32.5

33.8

27.7

Av. rel. humid at 9 hour 

%

  42

44

35

38

44

48

42

38

34

31

31

36

39

Av. daily rel. humid 

%

  28

28

32

28

32

34

31

28

24

22

22

24

28

Rainfall 

mm

  79.5

61.0

45.0

22.1

17.0

23.1

5.1

4.1

1.3

7.8

8.1

39.1

313.2

Condon 119° 22' – 20° 00' – 10 m (Western Australia)

Av. max T. 

°C

  34.8

34.5

34.5

32.8

28.6

25.6

24.8

27.0

29.7

32.7

34.4

34.3

31.1

Av. min T. 

°C

  25.2

25.5

23.1

19.4

15.4

12.1

10.8

11.6

13.8

17.2

21.1

23.7

18.1

Av. T. 

°C

  30.0

29.8

28.8

26.1

22.0

18.5

17.8

19.3

21.8

25.0

27.7

29.0

24.6

Av. rel. humid at 9 hour 

%

  62

69

64

58

57

63

63

62

61

60

62

69

63

Av. daily rel. humid 

%  

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

Rainfall 

mm

  56.6

64.8

77.0

23.9

18.3

27.7

9.7

4.0

0.7

1.0

1.8

16.5

302.8

Port Hedland –118° 24' – 20° 19' – 7 m (Western Australia)

Av. max T. 

°C

  34.6

34.8

35.2

34.0

30.0

26.8

26.2

27.9

30.5

32.0

34.0

34.5

31.8

Av. min T. 

°C

  26.4

26.2

25.4

21.8

17.6

14.4

13.2

14.6

17.0

2.0

23.0

25.3

20.4

Av. T. 

°C

  30.5

30.5

30.3

27.9

23.8

20.6

19.7

21.2

23.7

26.0

28.5

29.9

26.1

Av. rel. humid at 9 hour 

%

  67

63

60

48

50

49

49

50

49

53

56

61

55

Av. daily rel. humid 

%

  63

63

56

49

49

48

47

49

49

52

55

60

53

Rainfall 

mm

  42.2

52.6

78.0

24.1

24.9

24.4

6.1

9.7

1.3

2.3

0.5

8.6

279.7

Roebourne –177° 09' – 20° 46' – 12 m (Western Australia)

Av. max T. 

°C

  38.2

38.2

37.0

34.4

30.1

26.3

26.1

28.3

32.0

34.6

38.0

38.8

33.5

Av. min T. 

°C

  26.2

26.2

25.2

21.4

17.8

14.5

13.0

14.2

16.4

16.2

23.0

24.8

20.1

Av. T. 

°C

  32.2

32.2

31.1

27.9

23.9

20.4

19.5

21.2

24.2

26.9

30.5

31.8

26.8

Av. rel. humid at 9 hour 

%

  52

53

55

46

48

51

47

48

41

43

42

47

48

Av. daily rel. humid 

%

  41

42

43

36

38

40

36

36

29

33

33

37

37

Rainfall 

mm

  42.2

47.0

85.9

24.6

27.7

21.8

5.6

5.1

2.0

1.6

1.6

14.0

278.9

Darwin –130° 51' – 12° 28' – 29 m (Northern Territory)

Av. max T. 

°C

  32.1

32.0

32.3

33.2

32.2

30.9

30.3

31.4

32.8

33.7

34.0

33.3

32.3

Av. min T. 

°C

  25.1

25.0

25.1

24.4

22.5

20.9

19.9

20.9

23.2

25.1

25.7

25.6

23.6

Av. T. 

°C

  28.6

28.5

28.7

28.8

27.4

25.9

25.1

26.2

28.0

29.4

29.8

29.4

28.0

Av. rel. humid at 9 hour 

%

  80

80

79

68

60

55

55

61

65

69

70

73

68

Av. daily rel. humid 

%

  71

72

68

54

47

47

44

45

49

52

58

68

56

Rainfall 

mm

411.0

314.2

284.0

78.2

8.4

2.3

0.2

0.5

15.2

49.0

109.8

217.7

490.5

Wyndham –128° 07' – 15° 27' – 7 m (Western Australia)

Av. max T. 

°C

  35.6

35.3

35.1

34.9

32.3

29.9

29.4

31.4

34.2

36.0

37.0

36.4

34.0

Av. min T. 

°C

  26.8

26.6

26.4

25.1

22.4

20.0

19.0

20.9

23.8

26.6

27.4

27.4

24.3

Av. T. 

°C

  31.2

30.8

30.8

30.0

27.3

25.0

24.2

26.1

29.0

31.3

32.2

31.9

29.1

Av. rel. humid at 9 hour 

%

  66

67

63

46

41

40

38

40

44

52

55

60

51

Av. daily rel. humid 

%

  54

54

49

38

37

37

35

39

33

47

50

52

45

Rainfall 

mm

172.4

160.0

132.6

12.7

3.3

5.1

2.0

0.5

1.3

9.6

39.4

99.6

638.8

Port George IV –124° 43' – 15° 25' – 594 m (Western Australia)

Av. max T. 

°C

  32.6

32.4

32.9

33.9

32.3

30.4

30.0

31.8

33.9

34.5

35.1

34.1

32.5

Av. min T. 

°C

  24.6

24.4    

23.9

20.3

16.5

13.9

11.9

13.8

17.3

21.5

24.1

25.1

19.7

Av. T. 

°C

  28.6

  28.4

28.4

27.1

24.4

22.2

20.9

22.8

25.6

28.0

29.6

29.6

26.3

Av. rel. humid at 9 hour 

%

  76

77

76

67

62

60

60

62

61

61

64

69

67

Av. daily rel. humid 

%

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

Rainfall 

mm

284.0

282.7

254.3

54.4

24.4

19.1

7.6

1.0

1.5

9.9

46.7

194.3

1279.9

Katherine –132° 42' –14° 06'

Hottest month: av. max 38.1 - av. min: 24.7

Coldest month: av. max 30.2 - av. min: 13.2

Rainfall 

mm

232.2

201.4

156.2

34.0

5.6

2.0

0.8

0.5

5.8

29.7

83.8

199.4

951.4

Royhill –119° 54' – 22° 36'

Rainfall 

mm

  41.9

53.3

47.0

22.3

19.0

16.8

11.7

6.1

1.8

4.3

7.4

24.9

256.5

Annex Ic.

Location of Senegalese research sites

S i t e s

Long.

Lat.

Alt.

Distance from sea

Av. rainfall 1930/1961

Short-fall for 1970

Official met. station

Bambey

16° 28'

14° 42'

20m

70 km

665.8

 – 30%

Diourbel

Bandia

17° 02'

14° 35'

12m

10 km

(730.0)

(– 43%)

Thiès

linguere

15° 07'

15° 23'

20m

170 km

525.2

  –35%

Linguère

Keur Mactar

16° 11'

14° 02'

6m

70 km

788.7

  –29%

Kaolack

M'biddi

14° 57'

16° 08'

 

170 km

(400.0)

 

Podor

Climatological data for Senegalese sites (Asecna) 

S i t e s

 

01

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

Year

Podor 14° 56'W – 16° 33' N

Av. max T.

°C

31.5

32.7

37.4

39.4

41.3

40.2

 36.8

 34.7

 34.6

35.0

34.1

30.1

  35.7

Av. min T.

°C

15.2

16.1

18.2

20.5

22.5

23.9

 24.4

 24.4

 24.9

24.9

21.8

16.5

  21.1

Av. T.

°C

23.2

24.8

27.5

26.9

32.1

32.2

 30.8

29.8

 29.8

30.0

28.0

23.1

  28.1

Av. daily rel. humid

%

30

28

24

22

26

37

 54

 63

 65

53

43

34

  40

Rainfall

mm

  0.6

  1.6

  0.0

  0.1

  3.2

16.2

 67.7

133.3

 83.8

23.2

 3.0

 2.0

334.7

Linguere 150° 07' – 15° 23 N

Av. max T.

°C

33.2

34.1

38.2

40.0

40.5

38.0

 34.5

 32.7

 33.2

35.8

36.6

32.4

  35.8

Av. min T.

°C

15.1

16.5

18.1

19.9

21.7

23.4

 23.6

 23.4

 23.1

21.8

19.0

16.4

  20.2

Av. T.

°C

24.0

25.6

27.9

29.8

31.2

30.9

 29.1

 27.9

 28.6

27.4

23.9

27.8

 

Av. daily rel. humid

%

24

27

27

29

34

47

 64

 74

 76

56

41

31

  44

Rainfall

mm

  0.1

  1.5

  1.6

  0.0

  3.6

31.4

100.7

209.0

135.5

45.0

 4.3

 2.0

534.7

Diourbel 16° 14' – 14° 39 N

Av. max T.

°C

33.7

34.5

38.4

39.7

39.9

37.4

 33.8

 31.9

 32.9

35.2

36.1

32.7

  35.5

Av. min T.

°C

14.2

15.4

16.7

17.9

20.1

22.6

 23.1

 22.9

 22.6

21.7

18.6

15.5

  19.3

Av. T.

°C

23.7

25.2

27.2

28.6

29.8

30.1

 28.6

 27.7

 27.7

28.4

27.0

23.7

  27.3

Av. daily rel. humid

%

37

39

39

40

48

59

 72

 77

 80

71

55

41

  55

Rainfall

mm

  0.1

  1.3

  0.1

  0.2

6.3

40.2

139.5

259.8

189.1

55.0

 4.5

 4.2

700.3

Kaolack 16° 04'W – 13° 46 N

Av. man T.

°C

33.9

34.9

38.7

39.7

38.4

35.7

 32.5

 31.2

 32.5

34.3

35.7

33.1

  35.1

Av. min T.

°C

15.6

16.8

18.0

19.6

21.4

23.6

 23.8

 23.2

 23.2

23.1

20.4

16.9

  20.5

Av. T.

°C

24.8

26.5

28.5

29.6

30.3

30.0

 28.7

 27.6

 28.1

28.8

27.8

25.2

  27.9

Av. daily rel. humid

%

32

36

35

38

48

63

 75

 82

 83

75

57

41

  55

Rainfall

mm

0.5

  0.9

  0.0

  0.1

78

61.1

160.2

295.1

200.7

63.8

 4.0

 2.6

796.8

Thies 14° 48'w – 16° 57 n

Av man T.

°C

31.6

31.6

33.6

33.4

33.1

33.3

 31.7

 30.6

 31.4

32.6

33.4

30.9

  32.3

Av. min T.

°C

15.0

15.9

16.8

17.1

19.6

21.9

 22.8

 22.7

 22.5

21.7

18.9

16.1

  19.3

Av. T.

°C

23.3

23.8

25.2

25.3

26.4

27.6

 27.3

 26.7

 27.0

27.2

26.2

23.5

  25.8

Av. daily rel. humid

%

                         

Rainfall

mm

  0.2

  1.8

  0.1

  0.1

  1.6

24.2

121.9

273.0

206.3

57.1

 3.4

 5.1

694.8

Annex II

Bambey site: 1974 introductions measured in Nov. 1979

Species

Provenance

Height (cm)

Section at base

A. bivenosa

1538

258

  74

 

1457

258

  48

 

1426

256

  63

A. coriacea

1536

235

  22

A. dunii

1395

415

  24

A.farnesiana

1534

190

  32

A. holosericea

1459

416

107

A. inaequilatera

1509

360

  92

A. aff. linarioïdes

1466

280

  99

A. monticola

1460

287

  39

A. pyrifolia

1477

370

108

 

1532

344

  44

A. sclerosperma

1525

295

  49

 

1549

207

  35

 

1543

207

  38

A. spathulata

1539

120

  12

A. tenuisissima

1519

156

  26

 

1485

184

  28

A. tetragonophyla

1548

  85

    4

A. tumida

1462

425

170

A. cyanophylla

Morocco

–

–

Annex III

 Bambey site
 1974 introductions measured in Nov. 1979

A. bivenosa

1538

265

  62

94

 

1457

210

  25

82

 

1526 By

207

  30

79

   

270

  52

91

A. dunii

1395

415

  66

73

A. holosericea

1459

380

  68

91

 

1459 By

346

  52

79

A. aff. linarioïdes

1466 By

259

  53

82

A. monticola

1460

226

  18

–

A. mountfordae

1217

256

  46

–

A. plectocarpa

1261

248

  28

–

 

1477

236

  17

82

 

1461

245

  22

58

A. pyrifolia

1532

270

  30

64

 

1524 By

309

  22

 
   

282

  28

70

A. tenuisissima

1485

212

  49

–

 

1519

160

  15

–

A. tumida

1442

384

127

73

Annex IV

 Bandia site
 1977 introductions

   

12/1977

6/1978

12/1978

6/1979

11/1979

Species

 

H

%

H

H

S

%

H

S

H

S

%

A. bivenosa

     1538

47

  93

  84

146

10.9

 90

170

13.3

221

30.6

 90

 

     1457

51

  92

  65

148

  6.3

 90

168

15.4

227

22.5

 90

 

By 1538

67

  98

108

144

  9.4

 97

188

16.5

211

25.7

 97

A. coriacea

By 1460

58

100

105

171

  9.8

100

219

20.8

264

31.9

100

A. dunii

     1395

–

–

131

315

19.5

 50

–

–

400

34.0

 50

 

By 1395

32

  75

146

303

17.3

 67

321

24.2

366

31.7

 67

 

     1459

40

100

157

293

30.6

100

301

19.5

400

74.6

100

A. holosericea

     1125

84

  90

159

239

19.7

 66

263

14.9

325

56.6

 64

 

By 1459

46

100

131

264

18.3

100

268

19.0

365

52.8

100

A. aff. linarioïdes

By 1468

90

  96

126

255

19.4

 96

265

13.9

355

45.7

 96

A. monticola

     1460

37

  62

117

206

12.2

 50

222

15.4

298

32.9

 48

 

By 1460

40

  94

116

229

10.1

 92

218

15.2

218

23.1

 92

A. plectocarpa

     1261

35

  72

  91

195

15.2

 72

263

17.1

364

46.3

 68

 

     1532

42

  94

  91

189

14.8

 92

249

12.0

282

16.6

 92

 

     1461

49

  78

100

206

11.2

 78

182

13.8

275

20.3

 78

A. pyrifolia

     1477

45

  50

  84

183

11.7

 90

240

12.8

242

17.8

 90

 

By 1477

39

  88

  91

240

10.4

 88

225

12.4

271

20.7

 84

 

By 1532

57

100

  96

270

17.1

100

252

17.2

279

21.1

 76

A. sclerosperma

By 1525

59

  97

  99

154

  9.1

 97

210

16.8

251

27.2

 97

A. tenuisissima

     1519

  9

  69

  47

121

–

 63

133

–

174

–

 56

 

     1442

26

100

  95

304

26.4

 72

262

20.4

370

48.3

 85

A.tumida

     1484

42

100

112

255

15.9

 90

251

18.2

382

28.0

 83

 

By 1462

67

  98

142

274

15.1

 93

287

       

A. cyanophylla

Maroc

51

  94

140

223

24.4

 80

153

15.0

277

35.7

 40

A. cyclops

Maroc

29

  91

  54

80

–

 44

 88

–

120

–   7
 

12/1978

6/1979

11/1979

 

Species

H

%

H

H

S

%

H Height in cm

A. salicina

91

100

221

266

 

99

S Section in cm2

Annex V

  Keur-Mactar site – 1977 trials
  Soil beneath Acacia seyal

Species

12/1977

6/1978

12/1978

6/1979

12/1979

 

H

%

H

%

H

%

H

S

%

H

S

%

A. holosericea

49

100

105

100

193

100

242

23

100

250

45

100

A.linarioïdes

78

  96

  96

  96

131

  96

159

18

  96

237

42

  96

A. bivenosa

56

100

  48

100

  73

  96

136

  9

  96

170

–

  96

A. tumida

60

  76

100

  68

156

  68

220

23

  68

226

29

  56

A. sclerosperma

65

  96

  73

  97

119

  96

168

11

  96

203

–

  96

A. pyrifolia

45

  60

  64

  56

101

  52

140

11

  52

234

–

  52

A. plectocarpa

32

  24

  48

  20

  68

  16

120

  7

  12

157

18

  12

Soil beneath Combretum

A, holoserica

47

92

  87

92

201

 92

224

24

92

354

45

 88

A. linarioides

98

96

104

96

178

 96

213

25

96

276

53

 96

A. bivenosa

52

88

  49

88

  91

 88

138

11

88

193

–

 88

A.tumida

59

88

101

88

161

 84

217

17

84

342

41

 72

A. sclerosperma

63

96

  73

96

120

 96

188

17

96

220

–

 96

A. plectocarpa

53

80

  79

80

173

 80

228

29

80

319

60

 80

Soil beneath Parinari

A. holosericea

48

100

100

100

186

100

268

24

  96

383

44

  96

A.linarioides

88

100

132

100

162

100

197

25

100

282

66

100

A. bivenosa

57

  96

  58

  88

  83

  28

137

  8

  92

177

–

  92

A.tumtda

76

100

189

  96

175

  76

256

29

  76

400

66

  72

A. sclerospenna

65

100

  76

  96

  97

  92

  95

  3

  24

133

–

  24

A. monticola

58

  60

115

  60

151

  32

211

19

  32

259

38

  32

A. coriacea

56

  96

  79

  96

119

  88

161

  8

  84

417

22

  76

H = height in cm; S = Section in cm2

Bottom land

Species

12/1977

6/1978

12/1978

6/1979

12/1979

 

H

%

H

%

H

%

H

S

%

H

S

%

A. holosericea

50

100

145

100

254

100

302

32

100

436

71

100

A.linarioides

92

  92

140

  92

114

  36

187

19

  56

270

44

  32

A. bivenosa

56

  92

  62

  92

  45

    8

120

28

    8

180

–

    8

A.tumida

67

  92

150

  84

134

  56

260

32

  52

392

77

  52

A.sclerosperma

74

  88

  67

  88

  59

  44

166

14

  44

183

–

  40

A. monticola

56

  92

111

  92

180

    4

210

10

    4

280

72

    4

Pure salt-pans

A. holosericea

48

  96

103

  92

175

  82

231

29

 82

344

54

 82

A.linarioides

72

100

  65

100

  93

  92

133

13

 92

187

27

 92

A. bivenosa

49

  92

  38

  52

  51

  40

  62

–

 24

  66

–

 20

Grassy salt-pans

A. holosericea

34

  96

  70

  96

136

  88

155

15

  88

229

39

 88

A.linarioides

75

  88

  86

  88

114

  88

185

19

  88

250

41

 88

A. bivenosa

55

100

  51

  92

  67

  76

111

13

  72

136

–

 72

A. tumida

69

  68

  89

  68

155

  56

207

17

  56

293

44

 56

A.sclerosperma

48

  80

  52

  76

  78

  76

138

15

  76

139

–

 76

A. pyrifolia

44

  52

  40

  52

  72

  52

117

7

  52

148

–

 52

H = height in cm; S = Section in cm2

Previous PageTop Of PageNext Page