Appendix 2

Livestock production systems: descriptions and examples

 

 << Previous    Next >>

     1. Descriptions
       

LGA (Livestock only, rangeland-based arid/semi-arid)

  • Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA): Pastoralists in the Sahel, northern Kenya, southern Sudan, southern Ethiopia, Botswana, Namibia

LGH (Livestock only, rangeland-based humid/subhumid)

  • Central and South America (CSA): Extensive meat and milk production systems in the lowlands of Costa Rica

LGT (Livestock only, rangeland-based temperate/tropical highland)

  • CSA: Dairy systems near Bogota, Colombia

  • CSA: Andean region. Small dual-purpose systems in northern and central parts of Peru near Cajamarca and Junin (Mantaro valley), Altiplano of Peru and Bolivia, and southern and northeastern Ecuador; sheep-grazing systems in central Peru; camelid and sheep-grazing systems in the Altiplano of Peru and Bolivia

MRA (Mixed rainfed arid/semi-arid)

  • SSA: Mixed crop–livestock farms in parts of the Sahel (e.g. Burkina Faso, northern Nigeria); Zimbabwe semi-subsistence mixed crop–livestock communal sector.

  • South Asia (SA): Dryland systems in India (cattle, sheep, goats, buffalo)                

MRH (Mixed rainfed humid/subhumid)

  • SSA: Tsetse belt across central and West Africa

  • South-East Asia (SEA): Rice–cattle systems; maize–cattle systems; plantation        crops–small ruminants/cattle systems

  • CSA: Maize–beans–pasture systems in Nicaragua                                            

MRT (Mixed rainfed temperate/tropical highland)

  • SSA: Smallholders in the Ethiopian highlands where oxen for traction are important; small-scale dairy farms in the highlands of East Africa

  • SA: Wheat–maize/livestock systems in India (Gangetic Plains); wheat–maize/cattle systems in southwestern China

  • CSA: Mixed crop–livestock smallholdings in the highlands of Colombia                   

  • CSA: Andean region—mixed crop–livestock smallholdings in the highlands of the Andean Region (Ecuador, Peru and Bolivia); northern and central Peru near Cajamarca and Junin (Mantaro valley); Altiplano of Peru and Bolivia; southern and northeastern Ecuador.

MIA (Mixed irrigated arid/semi-arid)

  • SA: Small-scale buffalo milk production; sheep and goats in Pakistan and India        

MIH (Mixed irrigated humid/subhumid)

  • SEA and SA: Irrigated rice–buffalo systems of The Philippines, Vietnam and India

MIT (Mixed irrigated temperate/tropical highland)

  • East Asia: Irrigated rice and dairy farms in North and South Korea, Japan and China

LLM (Landless mono-gastric system) and LMR (Landless ruminant system)

  • Asia: Pig and poultry production in Asia; goats and sheep in semi-arid/arid areas of SA

 2. Examples

LGA – Livestock only, rangeland-based arid and semi-arid
Sub-Saharan Africa examples include:
Pastoralists in the Sahel, northern Kenya, southern Sudan, southern Ethiopia, Botswana, Namibia

Livelihood system of a typical poor household: ranking and trend 


Type of capital Low   Moderate   High 

Human    
Social
Natural
Physical
Financial

Main causes of food insecurity
Drought, crop failure, lack of animal assets, lack of income-diversification opportunities

Main causes of poverty
Loss of animals due to drought, distress sales and cattle raiding; lack of reliable/accessible markets

Degree of crop–livestock intensification
Very low; but increasing in areas where cropping is possible

Degree of diversification of income sources
Very low

Average size of landholdings for a typical poor household
Most rely on common property resources; poorest sedentarised households are landless

Average herd size by species for a typical poor household
Poorest tend to have more sheep and goats and few or no cattle or camels

Livestock species
Mainly traditional breeds of cattle sheep and goats camels

Important livestock species for poorest households
Sheep; goats; camels

Physical resources and variability
Range is the main resource, characterised by high seasonal variability

Agricultural products and services provided by livestock
Beef, milk, goat meat, goat and camel milk; transport; cultural/social services; asset building; security against income shocks

Degree of market integration
Low; systems are predominantly subsistence-based

General economic and system trends
With increasing population, the LGA system tends to evolve into mixed systems, mainly MRA

Environmental concerns
Degradation of rangelands, adverse changes in species composition of vegetation, and soil erosion. Other issues include carbon sequestration, competition with wildlife and recreation

LGH – Livestock only, rangeland-based humid/subhumid

CSA example: Extensive meat and milk production systems in the lowlands of Costa Rica. 

Livelihood system of a typical poor household: ranking and trend 


Type of capital Low   Moderate   High 

Human    
Social
Natural
Physical
Financial


Main causes of food insecurity

Drought

Main causes of poverty
Low cash flow, little access to credit at competitive real interest rates, low adoption rates of improved forages

Degree of crop–livestock intensification
Low

Degree of diversification of income sources
High

Average size of landholdings for a typical poor household
15–20 ha

Average herd size by species for a typical poor household
15 cattle; 23 pigs; 45 chickens

Livestock species
Cattle; pigs; poultry

Important livestock species for poor households
Cattle; pigs; poultry

Physical resources and variability
Good and permanent access to transport and farm inputs; good public infrastructure

Agricultural products and services provided by livestock
Meat, milk, eggs

Degree of market integration
High

General economic and system trends
Livestock production is expanding and increasing; the activity is very profitable

Environmental concerns
Land degradation from overgrazing during the dry season; loss of biodiversity

LGT  Livestock only, rangeland-based temperate/tropical highland

CSA example: Dairy systems near Bogota, Colombia

Livelihood system of a typical poor household: ranking and trend 


Type of capital Low   Moderate   High 

Human    
Social
Natural
Physical
Financial

Main causes of food insecurity
Poor feed supply, livestock diseases

Main causes of poverty
Low cash flow, lack of access to credit

Degree of croplivestock intensification
Low

Degree of diversification of income sources
High

Average size of landholdings for a typical poor household
5 ha

Average herd size by species for a typical poor household
5 cows; 12 pigs; 45 chickens

Livestock species
Grade dairy cattle; pigs; poultry

Important livestock species for poor households
Cattle; pigs; poultry

Physical resources and variability
Good and permanent public infrastructure access to markets and transport system

Agricultural products and services provided by livestock
Meat, milk, eggs

Degree of market integration
High

General economic and system trends
Growing economy and increasing demand for milk; trend towards expansion of this system

Environmental concerns
Land degradation; loss of biodiversity

LGT   Livestock only, rangeland-based temperate/tropical highland
CSA additional examples:
Andean region. Small dual-purpose systems in northern and central Peru near Cajamarca and Junin (Mantaro valley), Altiplano of Peru and Bolivia, southern and northeastern Ecuador; sheep-grazing systems in central Peru; camelid and sheep-grazing systems in the Altiplano of Peru and Bolivia.

Livelihood system of a typical poor household: ranking and trend 


Type of capital Low   Moderate   High 

Human    
Social
Natural
Physical
Financial

Main causes of food insecurity
Lack of income diversification opportunities; lack of animal assets; frost risk; drought

Main causes of poverty
Poor market access, distress sales

Degree of croplivestock intensification
Varies, but generally few purchased inputs

Degree of diversification of income sources
Generally low, limited off-farm opportunities

Average size of landholdings for a typical poor household
Most rely on common property resources

Average herd size by species for a typical poor household
2–8 cattle; 6–12 sheep; 20–65 alpacas. Poorest tend to have more sheep and few or no cattle or came­lids. Sheep and poultry most important for poorest households (usually under the control of women)

Livestock species
Cattle, predominantly cross-breeds, exotic and criollo breeds (Bos taurus); sheep, criollo and Corriedale crosses; alpacas and llamas

Important livestock species for poor households
Sheep, cattle, alpacas, llamas

Physical resources and variability
Grazing is the main feed resource and is characterised by high seasonal variability

Agricultural products and services provided by livestock
Milk, meat, fibre, wool; animal traction and transport

Degree of market integration
Low-to-moderate market orientation; these systems are mostly found in marginal locations

General economic and system trends
Moderate production potential in global terms; potential intensification is limited by market forces and environmental issues

Environmental concerns
Degradation of rangelands; water quality and conservation: adverse changes in botanical composition of vegetation; soil erosion; methane emissions; loss of biodiversity; carbon sequestration

MRA Mixed rainfed arid/semi-arid
SSA examples include:
Mixed crop–livestock farms across the semi-arid (also known as dry savanna) region of West Africa; Zimbabwe semi-subsistence mixed crop–livestock communal sector

Livelihood system of a typical poor household: ranking and trend 


Type of capital Low   Moderate   High 

Human    
Social
Natural
Physical
Financial

Main causes of food insecurity
Drought, crop failure, lack of animal assets, poor and declining soil fertility with lack of fertilizer

Main causes of poverty
Loss of animals due to drought, distress sales, crop failure; lack of income-diversification opportunities; poor market access

Degree of croplivestock intensification
Varies, but generally few purchased inputs, so manure is important for soil fertility. Scarcity of fodder in dry season results in crop residues being an essential feed resource

Degree of diversification of income sources
Varies, but generally low (few cash crops for these dry areas; limited off-farm opportunities, but remittances can be important where a family member has migrated)

Average size of landholdings for a typical poor household
2–12 ha, often fragmented

Average herd size by species for a typical poor household
5–12 sheep and goats; a few poultry for poorest households (usually under the control of women); some cattle where Fulani have settled; many indigenous cattle throughout region, but often tended by transhumants/nomads

Livestock species
Cattle, predominantly indigenous breeds; sheep and goats; poultry

Important livestock species for poor households
Small ruminants; poultry

Physical resources and variability
Feed resources: crop residues (mainly poor quality) and rangeland; high rainfall variability

Agricultural products and services provided by livestock
Meat, milk, animal traction and transport; social/cultural (e.g. bride wealth)

Degree of market integration
Extremely variable, but very low for wide areas

General economic and system trends
Population growth is leading to over-exploitation of the natural resource base

Environmental concerns
Methane emissions; overgrazing and range degradation; deforestation

MRA Mixed rainfed arid/semi-arid
SA example:
Dryland systems in India (cattle, sheep, goats, buffalo)

Livelihood system of a typical poor household: ranking and trend 


Type of capital Low   Moderate   High 

Human    
Social
Natural
Physical
Financial

Main causes of food insecurity
Drought, crop failure, lack of animal assets, temperature extremes, lack of water

Main causes of poverty
Loss of animals due to drought, distress sales, crop failure; lack of income-diversification opportunities, poor market access

Degree of croplivestock intensification
Generally weak, transhumance in search of animal feed

Degree of diversification of income sources
Generally poor

Average size of landholdings for a typical poor household
0.5–1.5 ha

Average herd size by species for a typical poor household
30–55 sheep and goats; 3–8 buffalo; 3–5 cattle

Livestock species
Cattle, predominantly indigenous breeds; buffalo; sheep and goats; poultry

Important livestock species for poor households
Small ruminants—often only means of survival in the most arid areas

Physical resources and variability
Feed resource; grazing land; high rainfall variability

Agricultural products and services provided by livestock
Meat, milk, animal traction and transport; social/cultural; insurance; stock of wealth

Degree of market integration
Generally low

General economic and system trends
Population growth is leading to over-exploitation of the natural resource base

Environmental concerns
Overgrazing and range degradation; decreasing soil fertility; expanding desert margins; water scarcity

MRH  Mixed rainfed humid/subhumid
SSA example:
Tsetse belt across central and West Africa

Livelihood system of a typical poor household: ranking and trend 


Type of capital Low   Moderate   High 

Human    
Social
Natural
Physical
Financial

Main causes of food insecurity
Most households food-secure; crop and livestock diseases; human diseases (especially malaria and sleeping sickness); lack of inputs for cropping, particularly fertilizer; livestock dry–season feed shortage

Main causes of poverty
Lack of cash; insecurity

Degree of croplivestock intensification
Variable

Degree of diversification of income sources
Little off-farm income

Average size of landholdings for a typical poor household
Highly variable

Average herd size by species for a typical poor household
Few cattle because of tsetse and cultural practices

Livestock species
Local cattle (trypanotolerant) and sheep breeds; poultry; pigs

Important livestock species for poor households
Poultry; small ruminants

Physical resources and variability
Relatively dependable rainfall

Agricultural products and services provided by livestock
Meat, milk, animal traction and transport; social/cultural; insurance; stock of wealth

Degree of market integration
Poor

General economic and system trends
Expansion of livestock systems constrained by tsetse infestation

Environmental concerns
Deforestation; carbon sequestration; loss of biodiversity, with potentially large global impact; high risk of soil degradation due to continuous cropping

MRH  Mixed rainfed humid/subhumid
SEA example:
Rice–cattle systems; maize–cattle systems; plantation crops–small ruminant/cattle systems 

Livelihood system of a typical poor household: ranking and trend 


Type of capital Low   Moderate   High 

Human    
Social
Natural
Physical
Financial

Main causes of food insecurity  
Crop failures and consequent drought and lack of feed; livestock diseases

Main causes of poverty
Lack of cash, poor access to credit and markets; limited land areas and fragmentation; low productivity due to low technology applications

Degree of croplivestock intensification
Low to medium

Degree of diversification of income sources
High

Average size of landholdings for a typical poor household
0.3–0.8 ha

Average herd size by species for a typical poor household
1–2 cattle; 1 buffalo; 1–3 goats and sheep; 1–3 pigs; 5–20 chickens (meat)

Livestock species
Local cattle and buffalo; pigs; poultry; sheep and some goats

Important livestock species for poor households
Cattle; goats; pigs; poultry

Physical resources and variability
Poor infrastructure, post-harvest, marketing and processing facilities; considerable ecosystem variability; crop residues main feed resource; forages and weeds in roadsides and alleys also important; strong seasonality of feed availability

Agricultural products and services provided by livestock
Meat, milk, eggs, manure, draught power, transport, recreation

Degree of market integration
Generally poor

General economic and system trends
Expansion is constrained by low productivity (for both animals and crops), poor access to markets and extension services, and low adoption of improved technologies. Need for intensification because amount of land devoted to these systems cannot increase due to impact on natural-resource base (deforestation).

Environmental concerns
Deforestation; soil mining due to intensification of cropping systems and reduced use of fertilizer; soil erosion mainly in uplands; loss of biodiversity

MRH  Mixed rainfed humid/subhumid
CSA example:
Maize–beans–pasture systems in Nicaragua

Livelihood system of a typical poor household: ranking and trend 


Type of capital Low   Moderate   High 

Human    
Social
Natural
Physical
Financial

Main causes of food insecurity
Crop failure, drought, extreme weather variability

Main causes of poverty
Low productivity, low agricultural and livestock prices

Degree of croplivestock intensification
High

Degree of diversification of income sources
Medium

Average size of landholdings for a typical poor household
10–15 ha

Average herd size by species for a typical poor household
4 cows; 3–4 pigs; 5–7 chickens

Livestock species
Cattle; pigs; poultry

Important livestock species for poor households
Cattle; pigs; poultry

Physical resources and variability
Moderate transport system access; poor public infrastructure; low quality of housing and livestock–crop facilities

Agricultural products and services provided by livestock
Meat, milk, eggs, maize, beans

Degree of market integration
Moderate

General economic and system trends
Livestock activity is increasing; crop expansion limited

Environmental concerns
Land degradation; soil erosion; soil nutrient depletion; loss of biodiversity

MRT  Mixed rainfed temperate/tropical highland
SSA examples include: Smallholders in the Ethiopian highlands where oxen for traction are important; small-scale dairy farmers in the highlands of East Africa

Livelihood system of a typical poor household: ranking and trend 


Type of capital Low   Moderate   High 

Human    
Social
Natural
Physical
Financial

Main causes of food insecurity
Crop failure; crop and livestock diseases

Main causes of poverty
Loss of main household breadwinner; loss of assets due to distress sales; small landholdings, high population density; lack of off-farm income

Degree of croplivestock intensification
High

Degree of diversification of income sources
Moderate

Average size of landholdings for a typical poor household
1–5 ha

Average herd size by species for a typical poor household
1 dairy cow; 2 oxen for traction; a few sheep and goats

Livestock species
Multi-purpose cattle (meat, milk, traction); upgraded dairy cattle

Important livestock species for poor households
Dairy cows; sheep and goats; poultry

Physical resources and variability
Main feed resources: crop residues, roadside grazing, increasingly planted forages, relatively low rainfall variability

Agricultural products and services provided by livestock
Milk, beef, veal and mutton; traction; manure; capital assets and insurance

Degree of market integration  
Very low in some places such as Ethiopia, higher in others

General economic and system trends
The system is under pressure to specialise in specific products. In places this may give rise to landless systems

Environmental concerns
Loss of domestic animal biodiversity; use of agrochemicals; waste disposal; methane emissions; carbon sequestration; competition for recreation; loss of biodiversity; water conservation

MRT  Mixed rainfed temperate/tropical highland
SA examples include:
Wheat–maize/livestock systems in India (Gangetic Plains); wheat–maize/cattle systems in southwestern China.

Livelihood system of a typical poor household: ranking and trend 


Type of capital Low   Moderate   High 

Human    
Social
Natural
Physical
Financial

Main causes of food insecurity
Crop failure due to unfavourable climatic conditions, with impact on feed availability; crop and livestock diseases

Main causes of poverty
Loss of main household breadwinner; loss of assets due to distress sales; small landholdings; lack of off-farm income

Degree of croplivestock intensification
High

Degree of diversification of income sources
Moderate

Average size of landholdings for a typical poor household
0.25–1.0 ha

Average herd size by species for a typical poor household
0.5–1.5 cattle; 0.1–0.3 buffalo; 0.5–2 goats; 1–5 pigs; 5–20 chickens

Livestock species
Beef/traction cattle; meat goats; pigs

Important livestock species for poor households
Cattle (beef, traction); meat goats; pigs

Physical resources and variability
Crop residues main feed resources, with some grazing practised in communal areas; strong seasonal variations

Agricultural products and services provided by livestock
Milk, beef, veal and mutton; manure; draught power

Degree of market integration
High

General economic and system trends
This intensive system is under pressure to further specialise in specific products; market access is still weak

Environmental concerns
Loss of domestic animal biodiversity; high use of agrochemicals; soil erosion; waste disposal; methane emissions; carbon sequestration, competition with recreation, loss of biodiversity, competition for water

MRT Mixed rainfed temperate/tropical highland
CSA example 1:
Mixed crop–livestock smallholders in the highlands of Colombia. 

Livelihood system of a typical poor household: ranking and trend 


Type of capital Low   Moderate   High 

Human    
Social
Natural
Physical
Financial

Main causes of food insecurity
Livestock disease; cattle raiding; crop failure

Main causes of poverty
Low productivity; low prices

Degree of croplivestock intensification
High

Degree of diversification of income sources
Moderate

Average size of landholdings for a typical poor household
3–4 ha

Average herd size by species for a typical poor household
2–3 cows; 1–2 pigs; 6–7 chickens

Livestock species
Cattle; pigs; poultry

Important livestock species for poor households
Cattle; pigs; poultry

Physical resources and variability
Good access to transport system; good public infrastructure, access to markets; good housing and agricultural facilities

Agricultural products and services provided by livestock
Meat, milk, eggs (non-livestock products include plantains, coffee, fruit, beans, maize)

Degree of market integration
High

General economic and system trends
Livestock activity and fruit industry increasing

Environmental concerns
Land degradation; loss of biodiversity

MRT  Mixed rainfed temperate/tropical highland
CSA example 2:
Andean region; mixed crop–livestock smallholders in the highlands of the Andean Region (Ecuador, Peru, Bolivia); northern and central Peru near Cajamarca and Junin (Mantaro valley); Altiplano of Peru and Bolivia; southern and northeastern Ecuador

Livelihood system of a typical poor household: ranking and trend 


Type of capital Low   Moderate   High 

Human    
Social
Natural
Physical
Financial

Main causes of food insecurity
Crop failure; lack of income-diversification opportunities, crop and livestock diseases, frost risk

Main causes of poverty
Lack of cash and off-farm income; loss of assets due to distress sales; small landholdings

Degree of croplivestock intensification
High

Degree of diversification of income sources
Moderate to high

Average size of landholdings for a typical poor household
3–5 ha

Average herd size by species for a typical poor household
Cattle herd typically 5–15 cows; sheep 8–20. In communities herd sizes vary from 20–80 cows, usually kept together

Livestock species
Cattle, predominantly cross-breeds, exotics and criollo breeds (Bos taurus); sheep, criollo and Corriedale crosses

Important livestock species for poor households
Cattle; sheep; poultry; often a pair of oxen

Physical resources and variability
Grazing is the main feed resource characterised by high seasonal variability; in some cases hay from barley and oats is used

Agricultural products and services provided by livestock
Milk, meat, traction, transport

Degree of market integration
Moderately market orientated; crop–livestock systems are mostly found closer to urban populations.

General economic and system trends
High production potential in global terms. However, potential intensification of the system is limited by market forces and environmental concerns

Environmental concerns
Water quantity and quality; soil erosion; methane emissions; loss of biodiversity

MIA Mixed irrigated arid/semi-arid
SA example:
Small-scale buffalo milk production; sheep and goats in Pakistan and India.

Livelihood system of a typical poor household: ranking and trend 


Type of capital Low   Moderate   High 

Human    
Social
Natural
Physical
Financial

Main causes of food insecurity
Crop failure; loss of animals to drought; fragile environment

Main causes of poverty
Poor access to credit and markets; reliance on transhumance

Degree of croplivestock intensification  
Weak

Degree of diversification of income sources
Poor

Average size of landholdings for a typical poor household  
1–3 ha

Average herd size by species for a typical poor household  
3050 goats and sheep; a few buffalo

Livestock species
Cattle; buffalo; sheep and goats

Important livestock species for poor households
Buffalo; sheep and goats

Physical resources and variability  
High variability; feed and water are significant constraints

Agricultural products and services provided by livestock
Milk and animal traction, meat from sheep and goats, savings

Degree of market integration
In some areas, high (e.g. milk production is mainly located in the proximity of urban centres; with sheep and goats, generally poor

General economic and system trends
Increasing numbers of goats and sheep

Environmental concerns
Deforestation; chopping down trees for feed; loss of soil fertility; competition for water

MIH  Mixed irrigated humid/subhumid
SEA and SA examples:
Irrigated rice–buffalo systems of The Philippines, Vietnam, India.

Livelihood system of a typical poor household: ranking and trend 


Type of capital Low   Moderate   High 

Human    
Social
Natural
Physical
Financial

Main causes of food insecurity
Most households food secure; crop and livestock diseases; poor markets and marketing systems

Main causes of poverty  
Lack of cash; poor access to credit; low productivity; small land-holdings; fragmentation

Degree of croplivestock intensification
Medium to high (e.g. non-ruminants and market-oriented smallholder dairy)

Degree of diversification of income sources
Low–medium; some non-farm and off-farm income; additional income from high-value crops

Average size of landholdings for a typical poor household
0.3–0.8 ha

Average herd size by species for a typical poor household
1–3 cattle; 5–15 goats; 3–6 pigs; 15–30 chickens

Livestock species
Buffalo; cattle; pigs; poultry; goats

Important livestock species for poor households
Buffalo; cattle; pigs; poultry; goats

Physical resources and variability
Moderately good infrastructure, post-harvest, marketing and processing facilities; relatively low variability

Agricultural products and services provided by livestock
Meat (pork and poultry), milk, eggs; traction; manure; transportation

Degree of market integration
Moderate to high

General economic and system trends
Increasing mechanisation has resulted in declining animal numbers, e.g. buffalo; declining availability of farm labour because of competition from off-farm/non-farm employment; increasing specialisation and intensification

Environmental concerns
Public health issues; low efficiency of water utilisation; soil erosion; nutrient cycling; manure disposal problems and human health hazards, particularly in poor peri-urban areas, e.g. dairy production, pigs and poultry production; loss of agricultural land due to conversion to industrial systems; loss of biodiversity

MIT – Mixed irrigated temperate/tropical highland
East Asia examples:
Irrigated rice and dairy farms in North and South Korea, Japan, China.

Livelihood system of a typical poor household: ranking and trend 


Type of capital Low   Moderate   High 

Human    
Social
Natural
Physical
Financial

Main causes of food insecurity
Most of the calories obtained from cereals, diet quality needs to be improved                         

Main causes of poverty  
Small farm sizes and insufficient income diversification; deeply entrenched traditions

Degree of croplivestock intensification
Low to moderate

Degree of diversification of income sources
Low

Average size of landholdings for a typical poor household
0.5–1.5 ha

Average herd size by species for a typical poor household
5–8 pigs; 8–10 dairy cows

Livestock species
Cattle; sheep; pigs; poultry

Important livestock species for poor households
Cattle; pigs; poultry; sheep

Physical resources and variability
Highly variable; feed resources limiting in many places; crop residues and purchased feed important

Agricultural products and services provided by livestock
Milk, meat, wool

Degree of market integration
Moderate to high

General economic and system trends
The viability of this system is expected to diminish as a result of outcome of General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) negotiations; the system is expected to shift to more extensive production, using less water and chemical inputs; possibility of more displaced farms and farmers and increased poverty

Environmental concerns
Over-exploitation of shallow aquifers; net amount of cultivated land in China may decrease in the future because of urbanisation and expansion of agriculture onto more fragile lands; in the more peri-urban areas and intensive systems, serious human health hazards, e.g. zoonoses; competition for water; disposal of manure

LLM and LLR Landless monogastric and ruminant systems
Asia examples include:
Pig and poultry production; goats and sheep in arid/semi-arid areas of SA.

Livelihood system of a typical poor household: ranking and trend 


Type of capital Low   Moderate   High 

Human    
Social
Natural
Physical
Financial

Main causes of food insecurity
Most households food-secure; livestock and poultry diseases; nomadism/transhumance, search for feeds, constraints to animal production, e.g. feeds, water, animal health

Main causes of poverty  
Lack of cash; isolation and illiteracy (in arid/semi-arid environments)

Degree of crop-livestock intensification
Low (high for livestock and poultry only)

Degree of diversification of income sources
Poor; some non-farm/off-farm income

Average size of landholdings for a typical poor household
No land

Average herd size by species for a typical poor household
One sow and/or 1–2 fatteners (pigs); 3–5 chickens; 30–50 sheep and goats

Physical resources and variability
Considerable variability and minimal resources; good access to markets and other infrastructure in some areas; main feed resource: high-energy concentrates (mainly cereals, oilseeds and their by-products); system is knowledge- and capital-intensive with high production efficiency in terms of output per unit of feed; feed and water availability are major constraints

Livestock species
Almost exclusively exotic breeds of pigs and poultry; indigenous goats and sheep

Important livestock species for poor households
Pigs; poultry; goats; sheep; sometimes camels in arid areas

Agricultural products and services provided by livestock
Meat (pork and poultry), eggs, mutton, goat meat; manure/urine

Degree of market integration
High: products of this system are geared exclusively towards urban markets
Low: for goats and sheep

General economic and system trends
There is increasing demand for products of this system from urban/peri-urban consumers, hence there is pressure/potential for further expansion; goat and sheep numbers are increasing, but marketing channels are still not well developed; increasing awareness on animal welfare; public health issues, and animal disease epidemics threatening trade

Environmental concerns
Generation of waste (manure concentration); air and water pollution; degradation of forest margins and chopping down of trees.

 << Previous    Next >>