Previous PageNext Page

Community-based traditional irrigation schemes performance: A case study of Upper Awash River Basin of Addis Ababa sub-catchments

Tadesse Bekele,1 Girma Taddese2 and D. Peden2

1    Ministry of Agriculture (MoA), Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
2    International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI), P.O. Box 5689, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia


Abstract

Introduction

The study area

Results

Discussion

References


Abstract

The study was carried out in Addis Ababa sub-catchments along the Akaki River. The Akaki River is a tributary of Awash River in Upper Awash Basin with its two main catchments (Little Akaki and Big Akaki River) which drain into Aba Samuel artificial reservoir. The traditional irrigation schemes grow vegetables along the Akaki River and supply about 30% of the vegetable demand for Addis Ababa city. The water management in the schemes was very poor and some of the traditional irrigations schemes are located in the river course and face frequent over-flooding during the heavy rains season. Besides, there is great concern over the use of fresh vegetables from these schemes as they are irrigated with municipal wastewater. Some factories dump waste products and water directly to the river without treating. The concentration of heavy metals and coliforms is increasing below Aba Samuel dam, an outlet of Akaki River. The overall information showed that farmers get adequate benefit from traditional irrigation and own dairy cows. Finally the Addis Ababa sub-catchments community irrigation activity should be thoroughly studied for the benefit of the Addis Ababa community.

Introduction

The Awash River Basin is divided into Upper, Middle and Lower Awash basins. According to Zewdie (1994). Awash River starts at an elevation of about 3000 metres above sea level (masl) in the central Ethiopian highlands, west of Addis Ababa and flows north-east along the Rift Valley into the Afar triangle where it terminates in Lake Abe at an elevation of 250 masl. The main river length is about 1200 km.

The Awash Basin covers a total area of 110 thousand km2 and covers the regions of Oromia, Afar, Amhara, Addis Ababa City Administration and Dire Dawa Council. Awash Basin is an intensively used river basin in Ethiopia due to its strategic location, access roads, and availability of land and water resources. Currently 21,865 ha traditional and 4932 ha modern small-scale irrigation schemes have been developed. Irrigation potential in Awash Basin is estimated to be 206 thousand hectares (Table 1). However, the basin suffers from severe environmental degradation, annual flooding, improper use of land, and water resources, socio-economic constraints, poor agricultural practices, low yields and community health problems. Thus this paper assesses the performance of existing community-based traditional irrigation schemes in Upper Awash Basin. It also studies the water use efficiency of traditional small irrigation schemes in Addis Ababa catchments and the economic benefit of traditional small-scale irrigation schemes.

Table 1. Small scale-irrigation development in Awash Basin.

Regions within the basins

Small-scale irrigation

Total irrigated

Traditional

Modern

Area (ha)

Beneficiaries

Area (ha)

Beneficiaries

Area (ha)

Beneficiaries

Oromia

  24,282

1,249 2,409 7,471 26,691

Afar

3,114 12,581

3,114 12,581

Amhara

11,273

60,114

3,337 11,608

14,610

71,722

Addis Ababa

390 977

390 977

Dire Dawa

866

4,342 346 1,629 1,212 5,971

Grand total

21,865 102,296

4,932 15,646

26,796 117,942

The study area

The study was carried in Addis Ababa sub-catchments along the Akaki River. The Akaki River is found in Upper Awash Basin with its two main catchments (Little Akaki and Big Akaki rivers) which drain into Aba Samuel artificial reservoir. In the sub-basins of Awash Addis Ababa catchments, there are more than nine perennial river tributaries, which drain to main Akaki River. The catchment's area is estimated to be 137 thousand hectares. The studied schemes varied in size from 4 to 150 ha. Four of the schemes have water pumps with a capacity of 30 l/sec. The farmers are organised in traditional way of water users associations. Each irrigation scheme has water committee. The water committee is responsible for water administration and management, co-ordinating, operation and maintenance of canals and resolution of disputes among beneficiaries.

Membership includes both men and women and consists of 1574 family heads and 7630 families. Out of these 28% are women farmers. The farmers manage operation and maintenance works of their schemes.

Along the right and the left sides of the Akaki River, 389.5 ha of land is developed under traditional small-scale irrigation system (Table 1). The traditional irrigation schemes grow vegetables along the Akaki River.

The major soil types of the study area are Pellic Vertisols and Nitosols. Pellic Vertisols that are found at Akaki, just south of Addis Ababa, has too shallow soil depth at 3% slope with surface cracking features. Nitosols are found in the highland of Addis Ababa to the north-east of the catchments. Nitosols have very good potential for agriculture and have high water storage capacity.

The catchments have favourable climate for certain vegetable crops. The traditional irrigation water delivery system, irrigation frequency and water management systems are very poor. More often the farmers spend their time in maintaining canals, which they have to build every season after the small and big rain seasons.

Major crops grown

The major vegetable crops grown in the schemes are lettuce, Swiss charade, carrot, kale, cabbage, potato, zikuni (cucumber), cauliflower, beans, tomato, pepper and onion. About 85% of improved vegetable seeds are supplied by Agricultural Input Services Corporation (AISCO) and the remaining 15% seed bulk is grown and supplied by farmers themselves (Table 2). Table 3 shows the recommended improved vegetable suppliers.

Table 2. Traditional irrigation schemes in the sub-basin of Addis Ababa catchments.
Name of scheme

River

Districts

Irrigated area (ha)

Beneficiaries

Management type

Irrigation system

Women

Men

Total

Shankla ena Kacha Fabrica

Shankla

Coca Cola Fabrica

8.5

11

41

52

Farmers

Surface irrigation

Tinshu Akaki ena Keranio

T. Akaki

Keranyo

7.5

3

23

26

Farmers

Surface irrigation

Tinshu Akaki Mekanisa Goffa & Furi Saris

T. Akaki

Goffa Sefer

150

40

204

244

Farmers

Surface irrigation

Kebena ena Bulubla

Kebena and Bulbula

Peackock Park

7.5

6

25

31

Farmers

Pump operated

Kolfae ena Lideta

T. Akaki

Kolfae

51

17

92

109

Farmers

Surface irrigation

Fanta

Akaki

Akaki

10

28 28

Farmers

Surface irrigation

Mekana Brhan Tesfa

Akaki

Akaki

12

45

20

65

Farmers

Pump operated

Mekana Yersha Emat Abat Turetegnoch

Akaki

Akaki

5

5

17

22

Farmers

Surface irrigation

Fnote Selam

Akaki

Akaki

5

5

60

65

Farmers

Surface irrigation

Abat Enat Turetegnoch

Akaki

Akaki

5.5

99

126

225

Farmers

Pump operated

Chello

Akaki

Akaki

4

90

90

Farmers

 

Bole Lemi

Akaki

Bole

4

20

20

Farmers

Pump operated

Other smallholders

Akaki   119.5

100

497

597

Farmers

Surface irrigation

Total

 

 

389.5

441

1133

1574

 

 

 

Table 3. Improved vegetable seed recommended for irrigation schemes for the study area.
Vegetable

Improved variety

Seeding rate
(kg/ha)
Price 
(ETB*/kg)
Total price
(ETB/ha)

Potato

Tollcha

1500–2000 2.75

4125

Tomato

Marglov, money maker, Roma.VF

0.22

490

107.8

Carrot

Nantes

3.6

176

792

Onion

Red croyale

3.5

260

910

Pepper

Marecofana

0.6

30

18

Beet root

Detroit dark red

16

150

2400

Cabbage

Copenhagen

0.4

400

160

Lettuce

Great Leakes mesa

1.7

180

306

Leek

  3.5

200

700

S. charade

Ford hook giant

15

185

2775

Kale

Zkuala or local Guraghe

0.4

40

16

Cauliflower

Snow ball or Glacier

0.4

350

140

* In November 2005, US$ 1 = Ethiopian Birr (ETB) 8.72.
Source: Alemtsehaye (2002).

Crop water need

The Pen Man Montith method was used to calculate reference evapotranspiration (ETo) and Effective rainfall (Re) was calculated using USDA Soil Conservation Service method. Crop water requirement (ETc) is calculated by the formula (ETc = ETo × Kc) and field efficiency is taken as 60%. Net irrigation (In) was also calculated as In = ETc – Re and approximate net irrigation depth per irrigation application was taken by assuming the root depth of each vegetable crop and soil type of the study area. Number of irrigation application was calculated from: irrigation water need over growing season/net depth of each irrigation application.

Economic calculations

                Total cost = Labour cost (ETB/ha) + Seed cost (ETB/ha)

                Net production (qt/ha) = Productivity (qt/ha) –15% production losses

                Total income (ETB/ha) = Net production (qt/ha) × Market price (ETB/kg)

                Net income (ETB/ha) = Total income (ETB/ha) – Total cost (ETB/ha)

                Feasibility ratio = Net income (ETB/ ha)/Total cost (ETB/ha)

Results

In general, net irrigation requirement for cabbage and kale for the first season was 396 mm and the lowest irrigation water requirement was recorded for leek in the second season. The field irrigation requirement was also 673.5 mm for cabbage and kale. Similar trends were also reflected for number of irrigation application for both crops. The least number of irrigation applications was for leek in the first cropping season. Moreover, the highest irrigation interval was recorded for tomato in the second cropping season and the lowest irrigation interval was observed for lettuce (Table 4). Generally lettuce was the most important vegetable produced in all of the schemes. The lettuce area coverage was 54.92 ha. The next important vegetable crop is Swiss charade 48.63 ha, carrot 45.9 ha followed by kale, cabbage, potato, cucumber and cauliflower (Table 5). The result showed that the crop water requirement of each crop varies.

Table 4. Crop water requirement for vegetable growers in Addis Ababa sub-catchments of Upper Awash Basin.

Crop

Season

ETo
(mm)

ETc
(mm)

Rainfalla
(mm)

Rainfalle
(mm)

Netirreq
(mm)

Fieldirreq
(mm)

Aappirrno

Irrinter

Potato

1

515

422.3

68

65.7

356.6

606.2

20

6

  2

542

450.8

274

241.5

209.3

355.8

12

10

Tomato

1

515

397.1

68

65.7

331.4

563.4

11

11

  2

542

423.8

274

241.5

182.3

309.9

6

20

Carrot

1

515

348.5

68

65.7

300.3

510.5

10

9

  2

542

370.4

274

241.5

203.8

346.4

7

13

Onion

1

515

490.7

68

65.7

344

384.8

19

6

  2

542

438.4

274

241.5

196.9

334.7

11

11

Pepper

1

515

408.7

68

65.7

343

583.1

12

6

  2

542

438.3

274

241.5

196.8

334.6

7

11

Beets

1

515

321.5

68

65.7

273.3

464.6

9

6

  2

542

345.6

274

241.5

179

304.2

6

11

Cabbage

1

515

461.9

68

65.7

396.2

673.5

22

8

  2

542

429.1

274

241.5

187.6

318.8

11

14

Lettuce

1

515

342.2

68

65.7

294

499.7

17

5

  2

542

363

274

241.5

196.4

333.9

11

8

Cucumber

1

515

351.7

68

65.7

286

486.2

10

6

  2

542

375.1

274

241.5

133.6

277

5

11

Leek

1

515

293.9

68

65.7

228.2

387.9

13

6

  2

542

288.2

274

241.5

67.6

114.9

4

11

Swiss charade

1

528

260.4

171

153.6

209.7

356.5

12

9

Kale

1

515

461.9

68

65.7

396.2

673.5

22

8

  2

542

429.1

274

241.5

187.6

317.8

11

14

Pumpkin

1

529

244.2

171

153.6

193.5

329

11

16

Cauliflower

1

515

449.3

68

65.7

383.6

652.1

22

6

  2

542

464.9

274

241.5

223.4

379.7

13

11

Phaseolus

1

515

390.8

68

65.7

325.1

552.6

18

6

 

2

542

433.3

274

241.5

191.8

324

11

11

 

Table 5. Mean vegetable productivity under traditional irrigation schemes.

Vegetables

Cultivated area
(ha)

Cropping pattern (%)

Total production
(qt)

Productivity
(qt/ha)

Potato

48.7

12.5

9740

200

Tomato

15.03

3.85

2254.5

150

Carrot

45.9

11.8

9180

200

Onion

7

1.8

616

88

Pepper

5.75

1.48

172.5

30

Beet root

25.3

6.49

7590

300

Cabbage

32.57

8.36

9771

300

Lettuce

54.92

14.1

3295.2

60

Leek

16

4.11

1600

100

Swiss charade

48.63

12.48

7294.5

150

Pumpkin

3.6

0.92

1440

400

Cucumber (Zikuni)

10.31

2.65

4124

400

Phaseolus

10.27

2.64

215.67

21

Kale

39.06

10.03

2343.6

60

Cauliflower

26.56

6.79

1567.04

59

Total

389.6

100

61204.01

2518

Source: Alemtsehaye (2002).

Only labour and seed cost expenses were incurred in the calculation of irrigation performance of the irrigation schemes. Producing cucumber appears to be more profitable for the beneficiaries with net income of ETB 65,660/ha as compared to the rest of the vegetable crops (Table 6).

Table 6. Labour and seed cost, value of crops and net incomes.

Vegetables

Labour cost (ETB/ha)

Seed cost (ETB/ha)

Total cost (ETB/ha)

Productivity (qt/ha)

Losses
(%)

Net production (qt/ha)

Market price (ETB/kg)

Total income (ETB/ha)

Net income (ETB/ha)

Feasibility ratio

Lettuce

915

306

1,221 150

15

127.5

2

25,500

24,279

19.9

Swiss charade

915

2775

3,690 150

15

127.5

2

25,500

21,810

5.9

Carrot

1,090 1,056 2,146 200

15

170

1

17,000

14,854

6.9

Cabbage

915

160

1,075 300

15

255

1

25,500

24,425

22.7

Kale

915

16

931

60

15

51

2

10,200

9,269

10.0

Potato

960

4,125 5,085 200

15

170

1

17,000

11,915

2.3

Beet Root

1,090 2,400 3,490 300

15

255

1

25,500

22,010

6.3

Tomato

1,095 108

1,203 150

15

127.5

1.25

15,938

14,735

12.2

Onion

1,090 910

2,000 88

15

74.8

2

14,960

12,960

6.5

Pepper

915

18

933

30

15

25.5

2.5

6,375

5,442

5.8

Leek

915

700

1,615 100

15

81

2

16,200

14,585

9.0

Pumpkin

1,200 1,250 2,450 400

15

340

1

34,000

31,550

12.9

Cucumber

1,090 1,250 2,340 400

15

340

2

68,000

65,660

28.1

Phaseolus

1,090 180

1,270 21

15

17.85

2.5

4,463

3,193

2.5

Cauliflower

1,090 140

1,230 60

15

51

3

15,300

14,070

11.4

Total

15,285 15,394 30,679 2,609 225

2,213.65 26.25

321,435

290,756

 

The cropping intensities were 200%, but 100% for Swiss charade and cucumber. The calculated net income was ETB 694.4/month and the total income was ETB 13,114,512.26/year for the whole schemes. An individual farmer may get ETB 694.4/month, which is a considerably high income for an ordinary Ethiopian farmer (Table 7). Some indicators were also calculated to determine the water use performance of the crops in the schemes (Table 8).

Table 7. Mean net income from the irrigation schemes.

Vegetables

Plot size (ha)

Net income (ETB/ha)

Total net income (ETB)

Cropping intensity %

Total net income (ETB/ year)

Average income per farmer (ETB/month)

Lettuce

54.92

24,279

1,333,402.7

± 200

2,666,805.36

141.2

S. charade

48.63

21,810

1,060,620.3

± 100

1,060,620.3

56.2

Carrot

45.9

14,854

681,798.6

± 200

1,363,597.2

72.2

Cabbage

32.57

24,425

795,522.3

± 200

1,591,044.5

84.2

Kale

39.06

9269

362,047.1

± 200

724,094.28

38.3

Potato

48.7

11,915

580,260.5

± 200

1,160,521.0

61.4

Beet Root

25.3

22,010

556,853.0

± 200

1,113,706.0

59.0

Tomato

15.03

14,735

221,459.5

± 200

442,919.07

23.5

Onion

7

12,960

90,720.0

± 200

181,440.0

9.6

Pepper

5.75

5442

31,291.5

± 200

62,583.0

3.3

Leek

16

14,585

233,360.0

± 200

466,720.0

24.7

Pumpkin

3.6

31,550

113,580.0

± 100

113,580.0

6.0

Cucumber (Zukuni)

10.31

65,660

676,954.6

± 200

1,353,909.2

71.7

Phaseolus

10.27

3193

32,787.0

± 200

65,573.95

3.5

Cauliflower

26.56

14,070

373,699.2

± 200

747,398.4

39.6

Total

389.6

290,756

7,144,356.3

 

13,114,512.26

694.4

 

Table 8. Indicators for comparing performance of community-based traditional irrigation of Addis Ababa sub-catchments in Upper Awash Basin.
 

Output
(ETB/ha)

Output per unit of water consumed
(ETB/m3)

Output per unit irrigation supply
(ETB/m3 )

Relative water supply

Beet root

44,020

246.23

144.86

7.24

Cabbage

48,850

272.53

160.34

6.90

Carrot

29,708

270.50

159.13

7.45

Cauliflower

28,140

123.13

72.44

6.98

Cucumber

131,320

322.67

177.40

6.20

Kale

18,538

124.03

73.04

6.90

Leek

29,170

157.78

92.82

5.61

Lettuce

48,558

543.80

319.80

7.39

Onion

25,920

33.54

25.22

6.15

Pepper

10,884

11.59

6.82

6.74

Phaseolus

6385

12.69

7.48

6.65

Potato

23,830

205.08

120.64

6.83

Pumpkin

31,550

58.70

34.52

8.55

Swiss charade

21,810

505.78

297.51

8.64

Tomato

29,469

86.22

50.72

6.71

Total

528,152

2974.27

1742.74

104.92

Discussion

Ethiopia is endowed with rich water resources, but yet untapped natural resources that could have largely contributed to the overall national economic development on a sustainable basis. Ethiopian agriculture is mainly rain fed, which is erratic. As a result of recurring drought, shortage of food and malnutrition became the main features of the country. Current agricultural strategy and policy of the government promotes irrigated agriculture in all potential river basins. The modern small irrigation schemes and traditional irrigation are sustainable and are easily manageable by farmers.

The key factor for the development of small-scale irrigation around Addis Ababa city is the large demand for fresh vegetables for the local market. However, vegetables grown under traditional irrigation schemes and the yield obtained are not so high due to poor agronomic practices, lack of technological inputs, and low level of water use efficiency.

Most of the scheme sites are found along the river mouth and exposed to flood hazards. During the rainy season, the fields are water logged and are not used for crop production. Traditional irrigation also faces common problems such as paucity in land holding, insufficient capital, inequitable water use and social conflicts in water use.

Irrigation water scheduling also is not well practiced and there is a possibility of applying excess water to crops beyond the crop water requirement. At the beginning of the growing season, the amount of water given per irrigation application, or the irrigation depth is small and is given frequently. Farmers who live around Addis Ababa are within the orbit of the existing market information system and get reliable sources of income.

The development of irrigated agriculture around Addis Ababa city needs a systematic cost–benefit analysis and the realisation of profitability for market-oriented production and the attainment of sustainable development. The market-oriented irrigated agricultural activity in general should consider proper estimation of labour, transport, maintenance, store, operation and investment costs in their cost–benefit analysis to optimise profitability. It should also give priority to the demand of the market in planning and producing vegetable products.

Farmers in irrigated schemes got better market access to income than that of rain-fed farming (Table 6). This gives every reason for the policy makers to channel more concern to smallholder irrigation development.

Despite its success and growing importance of peri-urban and urban small traditional irrigation, it is still subject to numerous constraints. Among them are insufficient access to non-contaminated or clean water, uncertainty about land tenure, and poor water use efficiency. The majority of beneficiaries hold less than 0.5 ha per household and land fragmentation has been the basic problem for irrigation development. Most of the farmland is found along the riverbed where irregular flood hazard can easily wipe out the farmland and high losses of water. Main feeder cannels are often poorly constructed and maintained and have poor water distribution system within the potential command area. This takes considerable amount of time, efforts and money to make them productive. The schemes lack proper maintenance and reconstruction of the headwork and are subject to uncontrolled use of water for irrigation. There is high loss of irrigation water in the traditional irrigation schemes when crossing gullies. Frequently inequitable distribution of water between upstream users and down stream users causes conflicts.

Women perform important agricultural activities such as seeding, weeding, harvesting, threshing, mulling and other related works. In areas under study, women's participation in the irrigation schemes is encouraging. There is equal farm level access to water and related obligation, equal participation in forums or network for collective water management and fair gender composition at the leadership level in the water users associations. In addition to growing vegetables, farmers have also livestock used for various purposes. Women play greater role in holding dairy cows than men in the schemes. The milk is supplied to the town and milk-processing factory in Addis Ababa.

Measures to boost agricultural production play a very important role in achieving development policy goals by reducing food insecurity, and increasing incomes and employment opportunities.

Expansion of new industries and disposal of industrial wastes to the Awash River Basin is of great concern to the nation (Girma 2001). Food and beverage factories tend to discharge heavy organic pollutions. Textile factories discharge dyes. All these disposals are dumped to Akaki River, which is the main tributary of Awash River. This river is the main source of irrigation water in the studied traditional community-based irrigation schemes, and supplies 30% of vegetable to the city. In this regard, the issue of health is critical in urban and peri-urban agriculture where water is polluted by industrial wastes, while application in farming of such untreated waste can pose significant health risks both to those who have direct contact with it and also to the general public who are affected through the food chain link (Furedy et al. 1999).

Small-scale irrigation schemes in the sub-basin leave much to be designed in terms of efficient water use and prevention of harmful conditions resulting from water logging and pollutant of heavy metals. It will be necessary to introduce better irrigation methods and water management techniques. Diversion of perennial river, harvesting and storage of water from frequent flash floods, and the use of ground water for irrigation should be targeted for future agricultural development and food security. In Ethiopia, as in the rest of Africa, many irrigation projects have proved to be unsustainable. Co-operation was unpopular with peasants and many were reluctant to invest their labour and energy in the irrigation venture.

All too often, state agents harbour strong paternalist attitudes towards peasants. There is frequently a tendency on their part to define the rules and set the guidelines governing irrigation schemes without involving the peasants.

Water security, like land tenure security, requires that users must have reliable and timely access to water adequate for their needs.

References

Alemtsehaye Biru. 2002. Assessment of the fertility and pollution status of irrigated vegetable framers around Addis Ababa. Addis Ababa City Government Agricultural Office, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

Furedy C., Maclaren V and Whitney J. 1999. Reuse of waste for food production in Asian cities: Health and economic perspectives. In: Koc M., Macrae R., Mougeot L.J.A. and Welsh J. (eds), For hunger-proof cities. IDRC (International Development Research Centre), Ottawa, Canada. pp. 136–144.

Girma Taddese. 2001. Land degradation: A challenge to Ethiopia. Environmental Management 27:815–824.

Zewdie Abate. 1994. Water resources development in Ethiopia. An evaluation of present experience and future planning concepts.

Previous PageTop Of PageNext Page